Shanda Lancaster

Looks good.

Sniff sniff? What's that smell?

Moooooooooooo!!!

I hope Shanda sues the *** off you, but something tells me she ain't bothered, she's above it all. She's still on SS.

You're not.

:zzz

Oh for F##@'s sake!

Not another FAKE piece of drivel about such petty NONSENSE directed to Singsnap?!

The Internet is scattered with numerous pieces like this, in some form or another, dressed up to look like some kind of official report , when in reality, it's just a vendetta that some crazy, alcoholic, no-life EX (banned) Singsnap member has launched against the site and it's members.

Stop. Look at yourself. You just don't see it do you?

Some of your rants and rages are so illegible and incoherent that it makes you look like an über-loony.

Oh how we all laugh . :roll :roll :grin

One day you'll wake up and smell the coffee instead of the alcohol, and spent an equal amount of (unemployed) time that you spent creating this *** illusion (that convinces no one) in trying to undo the mess that you've made for yourself.

You shoot yourself in the foot every damned time.

Leave it. Let it go. Get a life. Go find another interest or pass time.

***. :sigh

More *** from the King of scams. This would be their version of the outcome right?

No thank you, I think people prefer the outcome according to the facts. In fact I would reckon that anyone would prefer the facts than his version any day. Of course the fact you all posted this *** all over the Internet just goes to show you and anyone reading, you are hiding things and telling half truths.

So your Update stinks of lies. Have fun liars.

RE: The website myex.com Shanda Lancaster took it upon herself to post some very private/personal photos of me captioned with libelous remarks on myex.com in a hypocritical effort of defamation. I have no legal means to get these pics removed from this site!

:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :grin :grin :grin :grin :grin :grin :grin :grin :grin ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) *) *) *) *) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :roll :roll :roll :roll :roll :roll :roll :roll :roll :roll :eek :eek :eek :eek :eek :eek :eek :eek :eek :eek :eek :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :? :?

:? :? :? :?

:? :? :? :?

:? :? :? :?

:? :?

:? :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x come out come out where ever you all are hahahahhahahha You go girl Shanda you have them by the balls if they had balls :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz

Judy, is that you? :grin

Singsnap/Eatsleepmusic slam-dunks Diane Patchen and her fiancé Robert Smik right out of court with a win.

It seems this entire lawsuit was nothing more than elaborate fabrications as told by Diane Patchen and her fiancé Robert Smik to their attorney Francis X.Taney Jr. to bring a frivolous lawsuit with hopes of winning thousands of dollars from the defendants named in the suit found on pacer.gov.

Much to the dismay of the Plaintiffs the Judge in this case, Judge William H. Yohn Jr. saw right through this scam and threw out any motion the plaintiffs and their attorney tried to execute. The judge denied the motion to sever two of the defendants, as he said it would not serve justice and he stated these claims were "Frivolous" So what we have here is justice being served for the defendants wrongly accused by the plaintiffs.

It is a sad state of affairs when people such as Diane Patchen and her fiancé Robert Smik waste the court systems time. So we need to ask the question. Does money really talk, or the truth? The plaintiffs would have you believe the first to be true. In this case justice prevailed and this hoax of a lawsuit brought by the plaintiffs should embarrass them, and teach them a lesson. That lesson would be. Don't attempt to lie when you have nothing to back up your fabrications. This was a laughable attempt to win a lawsuit, start to the finish.

To those who watched this lawsuit unfold and wind down to a loss for the plaintiffs, we can only say this. Look before you leap.

It seems a settlement has been made and we can speculate it was in favor of the defendants. And we can also speculate this was to protect the plaintiffs and their attorney from sanctions. The plaintiffs selfishness at its finest.

If you’re considering suing someone in the future, read this case and do not and, we repeat do not attempt the same huge blunder, unless you have money to throw around and don't mind losing your shirt.

RE: The web-site myex.com Shanda Lancaster took it upon herself, (without my knowledge nor permission), to post very PRIVATE photos of me on myex.com I have no legal recourse to get these pics pulled down off this site! :(

I appreciate your support, BBAndrews18. Although I have plenty to sue for I won't. I don't need to. The people who have smeared my name are the ones who look foolish. I have nothing to prove since I did nothing wrong.

I'm sure the next comment will be "Oh, get real, you don't have money to sue!". While that may be true, I have been in touch with legal aid and it is most likely all I need to do is show them what you've done to me.

I have a feeling, however, in about a month the tides will turn on those who have done their best to make me out a villain. I won't need to do a thing.

In the meantime, I am turning the other cheek and walking away.

saw that too. sue them with what? hahahahahahah

hmmmm, maybe an attorney will pick out a kitty or doggie outta the 11 hoards of animals they have in trade?????

You are behind on your information, Diane, and just as charming as usual.

:roll

A citizen does not "file charges" nor do the police in this country. If she does "fly in" she better pay for two seats to park that wide load in. :zzz

A citizen is free to file a civil suit just like Diane did. A bogus and frivolous civil suit. That would make a lot of sense! (sarcasm in case you i.d.i.o.t.s missed that) :p

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Arrested? LOL As if. :grin

Man Hands you are the worst of the worst kind of Evil Hater. You will burn in ***.

SMH and RME :grin :p :upset :zzz :grin :p :eek :upset

No, a citizen doesn't fly in to press the charges. They do however have to file charges in the state the person lives in.

a duh. Depending on the case. The DA would issue a warrant for the person and the police knock on the door and arrest. Then one needs to be bailed out but not before they are arraigned by a judge and bail is set and paid.

First offenses still must be arraigned if they are arrested. A duh again.

My last job was at a 24/7 convenience store and I was the MANAGER... lol.

You make it sound as if I was Gomer Pyle!! As for being a dim wit... my IQ is 127. I never defamed anyone's business and I never 'creeped out' an author.

By the by, this is the FIRST time "I" have posted on this particular complaint other than the comment with the rolling eyes smiley.

Make sure you show your attorney all the hateful things you posted too. Because you posted so many things in your own name no need to even have anyone look too far for your fake names. You do not even bother to change your usual dim wit wording.

YOU are the *** *** for using another persons name to copy and paste old reports and again to remind you. It may have been a glitch in the system of pissed consumer or just luck.

Your location of Nashville appeared on the profile of the fake Judy Holland account you created and a screen shot was taken. You admitted to doing it by saying she deserved your wrath. You are so manic you have no idea how to keep your lies in order. And you are one to talk about anyone's looks.

Have you looked in the mirror lately? Even the pictures you posted here on this site of yourself looks like a future mug shot or a man wearing a wig. Did you ever hear of a thing called a hair stylist? Don't they have them down there in the back roads of Dickson?

Or do you just have your hubby take a knife while relaxing and tell him to throw it your way because you could use a few inches cut off . Grow up! This is the kind of baby *** you are accustomed to posting so thought you would enjoy a bit back. Oh and talk about chunky monkey's.

You are no light weight yourself. What a joke you are. Your main goal in this life is to ruin people because your life is so sad. You can always make believe anything online right Shanda?

So is this going to be your life Shanda? Posting a zillion reports on here and rip off for the rest of your life? I could have sworn I read you saying several times you were done.? I guess not.

Have fun, if this is what your only entertainment is.

And spare us all of your wonderful Husband and loving family because if that were really the case you would be so busy having fun with them that you would have no time for you dangerous behavior here. Jesus is watching your every move.

pissed consumer lifts all bans after a year

Sounds like a Welfare queen. And Good job threatening her here queeny. Expect to be arrested, in real life, in the future.

I have taken a screenshot of this. Expect a response, in real life, in the future.

:eek :x :upset :grin :p :grin :? :x :( :cry :sigh :eek :roll :eek ,) :) :zzz :zzz :?

:( :x :roll :p 8) :eek :upset :upset :upset :? :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset

All questions regarding Judy Johnson Wilson-Holland go to Stephen Zralek

615-238-****

Fortunately, I DID contact Mr. Zralek's office.

He declined to represent you OR Diane Patchen. He is a very smart man.

Seriously, shanda she's posting up until just an hour ago about you....

This qualifys as stalking/defamation/liable

Are you trying to get sued by shonda?!?!?!?

Shonda, get a lawyer Hun!

JUDY HOLLAND:

Birthday August 30, 1961. (51 years old for those who cannot do math).

Registration address for SSS2 Hemet, CA

3 Former address in Mission Viejo, CA and ONE in Hemet, CA

This complaint was made from Lake Forest, CA, a 15 minute drive from Mission Viejo, CA.

Judy... hey Jude...

Judith... SHUT UP.

I agree with you Ms. Lancaster on your insistance that we MARKYOURWORDS.

I have no doubt whatsoever that each and every one of your words are marked.

Photographed. Dated, then filed.

RE: The web-site myex.com Shanda Lancaster posted some very Private photos, captioned with a slanderous comment on myex.com in an effort to defame me. And I have no legal recourse to get these personal pics pulled off this site. :(

:zzz

stoopid to use kevins old site for singsnap agendas.

meanwhile, seems like singsnap is circling the drain . went to see if there were any good new songs and that place is like a bloody ghost town.

False accusations, my eye! Trevor McGuire and/or one of his cohorts bought the domain singsnapsucks.com after Kevin's "lease" ran out.

Or it was bought from Kevin, one of the two.

Seems funny that Kevin, who was the original owner of singsnapsucks and an ardent foe of singsnap after being banned, is now a happy member of singsnap once again. Smells like collusion, wouldn't you say?

Visit SingSnapSucks.com to find out more about these false accusations.

You are all so off base about who owns singsnapsucks that it makes me laugh until I cry. :grin :p :roll :grin

if hes posting a public statement claiming people with ss complaints are lying then hes posting libel.

and kevin????? dont come on here or anyone else for that matter and deny youre the owner.

that is getting seriously old.

your sneaky acct on singsnap is now alive and well and you put some *** *** fake cover story on your profile page. your a gutless wimp.

well actually kevin the owner of sinsnapsucks is the one who posted that letter on his domain.

he is also a hypocrite. how dare he call other people hateful towards singsnap when he was the one who created singsnapsucks in the first place?????

all the sudden everyone else is wrong except him???? uh, no I dont think so.

If people dont like a web site theyre allowed to say so. even kevin was. but kevin cant come along one day, make a deal with trevor for free gold or whatever and then post a letter on his domain calling people haters and saying that what people are posting about their dislikes about singsnap are untrue statements. how in the *** does he know?

was he scammed out of money? did he have a bad experience like many others? people are entitled to their opinion kevin (sneaky on singsnap)

look, you are more then welcome to make a deal with trevor and get back on singsnap. youre more then welcome to write a note and stick it on your old web site, but dont you dare start calling everyone else a liar now and saying that theyre haters. huge mistake

what an ***

1. Written by Shanda on October 25, 2012 from nashville, tennessee, US

This complaint was made by Michael Steward aka pamplemus.

Report

2. Written by Shanda on October 25, 2012 from nashville, tennessee, US

This complaint was made by disgruntled former (and now blocked for life) SingSnap member Michael Steward aka pamplemus. He was the administrator for the former hate site singsnapsucks.com. He hates SingSnap, Trevor McGuire, Katie Loudon, Lawrence D ickerson, and me. He is the most negative person I've ever come across... mean as a snake.

Mr. Michael Steward did not create this complaint. Someone used his identity. My apologies to Michael.

This complaint was made by Michael Steward aka pamplemus.

This complaint was made by disgruntled former (and now blocked for life) SingSnap member Michael Steward aka pamplemus. He was the administrator for the former hate site singsnapsucks.com.

He hates SingSnap, Trevor McGuire, Katie Loudon, Lawrence D ickerson, and me.

He is the most negative person I've ever come across... mean as a snake.

This case has been dismissed by Judge Yohn. In his decision he described the allegations as "frivolous." The Judge in the case has now scheduled a hearing to deal with a motion for sanctions against the Plaintiff, Diane Patchen and her attorney.

shanda wana :p my sac

u are all weirdos get real with your lil hs games

I always wondered what she had on him. Now I know, but you can you imagine what kind of demented individual would be willing to throw their "partner" under a bus like that?

Sociopath.

@To all:

Based on some of the exhibits posted on Pacer 'she' IS disturbed. The truth is not libel (although stranger than fiction sometimes).

Saying someone went on a murderous rampage and is wanted in 7 states, however, is LIBEL since it is NOT TRUE.

Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, GC.

Boo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lolololol watch what you post.

watch what you say.

watch what you think . watch what you put on video

:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :grin :grin :grin :grin :grin :grin :grin :grin :grin :grin :grin ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) *) *) *) *) 8) 8) 8) *) *) *) *) :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :roll :roll :roll :roll :roll :roll :roll :roll :roll :roll :eek :eek :eek :eek :eek :eek :eek :eek :eek :eek :eek :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :upset :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :? :?

:? :? :? :?

:? :? :? :?

:? :? :? :?

:? :? :? :?

:? :?

:cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :cry :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh :sigh You go girl!!!!!!!!!!!!! Shanda is right these people are :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz :zzz

Yes, my photo clearly shows I am a 'public terror'. A Tweety Bird shirt that says 'Hope and Wuv'...

pony tails... yep, clearly I am VERY dangerous.

NOT! :grin

Yes, Headmaster was my husband. I do not speak/type like he does and could not if I tried! lol

Case 11-5388 is DISMISSED and deemed FRIVOLOUS by the judge presiding over the case.

It is time for all you haters to admit you have been wrong on too many levels to count.

LMAO @ Headmaster - aka Shanda! So transparent and obvious....give us a break!

find out what? that people think it sucks?

yes.

alot of people do think that. get over it already

Find out for yourself and visit SingSnapSucks.com

"hilarious. good luck at getting posts deleted and um no. shanda honest and forthright? what a crock. the courts just said she wasnt honest. the courts just said she assaulted two people. the courts just said she is GUILTY of copyright infringement, libel and slander. seesm you DONT know mrs lancaster very well do you?"

I don't care if the posts you people make stay for all eternity because it shows the world your utter foolishness.

The COURTS have said NOTHING. One disturbed woman has fed a lot of people a lot of BS. I am fine as frog hair, don'tcha know? You people have been DUPED.

Oh, and ..... lololol, yes, he knows me very well. He is my husband. We've known one another for over 10 years. No one knows me better. Before you start trying to say I put him up to posting, think again. He brought his post here to my attention. I thanked him but said to just leave it alone from here on out. I can handle you people on my own. Good vs Evil... Good prevails. Guess who is EVIL? I'll give you a hint: it is NOT ME. :D

im wunderin if shandas *** ever gets jealous of all the *** that comes outta her mouth?????

Comments (2)

1. Written by HEADMASTER on November 6, 2011

to whom it may concern:

having known Mrs. Lancaster for many years, she has always been honest and forthright. So your prattle is nothing more than nonsensical *** and should be deleted.

hilarious. good luck at getting posts deleted and um no. shanda honest and forthright? what a crock. the courts just said she wasnt honest. the courts just said she assaulted two people. the courts just said she is GUILTY of copyright infringement, libel and slander. seesm you DONT know mrs lancaster very well do you?

I RETRACT MY STATEMENT THAT MICHAEL STEWARD HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH THIS COMPLAINT.

This complaint was made by Michael Steward aka pamplemus.

This complaint was made by Michael Steward aka pamplemus.

FOR ALL THE ABOVE THAT POSTS SUCH POPPYCOCK RHETORIC YOU ARE BEYOND CONTEMPT. FOR ONE YOU DO NOT KNOW SHANDA LANCASTER AND ARE SPOUTING THE ENDLESS RUBBISH OF ONE DIANE PUTIN WHO IS IN HERSELF A COMPLETE LIAR, AND ONE WHO WOULDN'T KNOW THE TRUTH IF IT BIT HER IN THE ***.

HAVING KNOWN MRS. LANCASTER FOR YEARS I DO HOPE THAT YOU ARE FORCED TO PAY FOR YOUR MORONIC IDIOTIC LIES.

This is LIBEL.

Go right on ahead and watch my every move. By saying that it shows just what a *** stalker you are.

everything said about Shanda is libel. Yet she posted an entire copy and paste about what libel is and she did as well in her own words.

If it is the truth according to Shanda it is not libel.

That would depend on what Shanda believes to be the truth and from what I have seen, she has posted a *** of a lot of libel. beware shanda eyes are watching your every move

@ Shanda the drama queen and liar!!

No one did anything to you woman that you did not deserve. You were told to keep out of the site.

You were banned. You make video's about being an anti bullying advocate yet you are being sued at present for doing exactly what you preach about in your video's. Or do you think this is still a baseless and frivolous lawsuit. you have said it a good 50 times or more on various sites.

Good Luck Honey you are going to need it. tick tock tick tock

just google her and learn all about...

Never heard of her.

Who the hail is this person?

This is LIBEL.

This is LIBEL.